Powered by Philanthropy, Clients & Scholars


Workplace 47

Social Share

Public Speaking - Trivium - Communication


No. 47 - 2024
Shock Doctrine: What can we Learn

The Pilgrim: 09.04.2025


Naomi Klein’s The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism is a profound exploration of how crises—whether natural disasters, wars, or economic upheavals—are exploited by those in power to impose neoliberal policies that often benefit the elite at the expense of the vulnerable. Klein argues that these “shocks” create a state of disorientation in individuals and communities, making them more susceptible to manipulation and control. By examining the psychological and sociological dimensions of this phenomenon, as well as historical and modern examples, we can gain valuable insights into the dynamics of power and resistance in times of crisis.

Klein’s central thesis posits that crises create an environment where traditional norms and values are suspended. This concept aligns with the psychological theories of cognitive overload and trauma responses. When individuals are faced with overwhelming stress, such as during a disaster or economic collapse, they often experience a fight-or-flight response, which can lead to a state of paralysis or compliance. Psychologist Judith Herman describes this phenomenon in her work on trauma, emphasizing how victims may become dissociated from their circumstances, making them more vulnerable to external influences.

Sociologically, Klein’s analysis reflects the ideas of theorists like Michel Foucault, who examined how power operates through social institutions. Foucault argued that power is not merely repressive but productive; it shapes knowledge and reality. In the context of the shock doctrine, those in power can redefine societal norms and values during crises, justifying authoritarian measures as necessary for recovery. This manipulation of public perception allows for the implementation of policies that would typically face significant resistance.

One of the most striking modern examples of the shock doctrine in action is the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005. The devastation of New Orleans provided a unique opportunity for neoliberal reforms, particularly in the education sector. As the city struggled to recover, the government and private interests pushed for the rapid expansion of charter schools, effectively privatizing public education. Many residents, traumatized by the disaster, found themselves powerless to resist these changes. Klein highlights how the urgency of recovery allowed for the implementation of policies that favored private interests over community needs, illustrating the exploitation of chaos for profit.

Another pertinent example is the 2008 financial crisis. The global economic meltdown led to widespread unemployment and social unrest, creating fertile ground for austerity measures. In Greece, the government accepted bailout packages from the European Union that came with stringent austerity conditions. These measures included severe cuts to public services and social welfare programs, disproportionately affecting the most vulnerable populations. Sociologists like Saskia Sassen have analyzed how such crises exacerbate existing inequalities, as those in power use the chaos to consolidate their wealth and influence. The Greek populace, overwhelmed by economic despair, often struggled to mobilize against these measures, reflecting Klein’s assertion that crises create an environment ripe for exploitation.

The COVID-19 pandemic serves as a contemporary example of the shock doctrine. The urgency surrounding public health led governments worldwide to implement emergency measures that prioritized corporate interests under the guise of protecting citizens. In the United States, the CARES Act provided substantial financial support to large corporations while leaving many individuals and small businesses struggling for aid. The pandemic created a sense of urgency that allowed for rapid policy changes, often sidelining equitable support for all and further entrenching existing inequalities. The psychological impact of the pandemic, combined with the fear of illness and economic instability, made many individuals more compliant with these policies, showcasing the interplay between crisis and control.

Historically, the exploitation of crises is not a new phenomenon. Ancient examples, such as the rise of tyrants in Greece during times of social unrest, illustrate how leaders have capitalized on chaos to consolidate power. For instance, the tyrant Cypselus of Corinth emerged during a period of political instability, promising stability and reform while ultimately maintaining control through authoritarian means. Similarly, the biblical narrative of Pharaoh’s response to the plagues in Egypt highlights how rulers can exploit disaster for their gain. The chaos created by these calamities allowed for the reinforcement of authoritarian rule, as the populace, facing overwhelming fear, accepted drastic changes to governance.

Philosophically, Klein’s work raises important questions about ethics and responsibility in the face of crisis. The philosopher Hannah Arendt explored the banality of evil, suggesting that ordinary individuals can become complicit in oppressive systems when they fail to question authority. In the context of the shock doctrine, individuals may become passive recipients of policies that undermine their rights and well-being, highlighting the need for critical engagement and resistance.

What can we learn from Klein’s analysis and these examples? Firstly, awareness of the shock doctrine empowers individuals and communities to recognize when crises are being exploited for political or economic gain. Understanding the psychological and sociological dynamics at play can foster resilience and resistance. Building social solidarity and trust in institutions is essential for fostering collective action during times of crisis.

Moreover, integrating psychological support into disaster response can help individuals and communities recover more effectively, reducing the likelihood of manipulation by those in power. Klein’s work serves as a call to action, urging us to stand together in the face of adversity and resist the forces that seek to exploit our vulnerabilities.

Ultimately, the lessons drawn from both ancient and modern examples remind us that the exploitation of crises is a timeless strategy. By examining these historical precedents, we can better prepare for and respond to contemporary challenges, ensuring that history does not repeat itself. Klein’s The Shock Doctrine is not just a critique of neoliberalism; it is a powerful reminder of the need for vigilance, solidarity, and ethical engagement in the face of crisis.

Social Share


If you wish print or republish this artIcle online, please send an email to admin@bwgela.com
This article is published by BWGELA under a Creative Commons license. "CC BY"
Created with